After a five-year legal battle that originated during the waning weeks of President Donald Trump‘s first administration, U.S.

US Federal Judge Amit Mehta ruled on Tuesday that Google did not have to sell off its signature Chrome internet browser or ...

In a landmark antitrust case, Judge Amit Mehta limited Google's search monopoly, blocking exclusive deals but keeping Chrome intact.

In major antitrust ruling, Google gets to keep Chrome and Android but still faces lesser penalties - SiliconANGLE ...

Plaintiff Penske Media Corp. "seeks to hold Google responsible for the millions of dollars of harm it is causing and illicit ...

The post Google can hold on to Android, Chrome: federal judge appeared first on Salon.com. It may seem like all brands are ...

A judge favored Google by rejecting an order to sell Chrome and Android, but required data sharing with competitors. The ruling boosts investor confidence and favors other tech giants like Apple.

Google will not be forced to sell off Chrome or its Android operating system, but will have to share some of its search engine data with competitors.

After Mehta’s initial ruling, the Department of Justice (DoJ) demanded that Google divest itself of the Chrome web browser ...

Google is barred from having exclusive contracts for its search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and Gemini app products, but doesn't have to sell Chrome.